For example, in Britain and France allowed the remilitarisation of the Rhineland without any nation intervening with the affairs that could easily be prevented.
The aims and tasks of the new movement are so gigantic that they can only be treated in a special volume. In a second volume, therefore, I shall discuss the programmatic foundations of the movement in detail and attempt to draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word 'state.
Their aim has often been for centuries the inner longing of hundreds of thousands, until one man stands up to proclaim such a general will, and as a standard-bearer guides the old longing to victory in the form of the new idea. The fact that millions bear in their hearts the desire for a basic change in the conditions obtaining today proves the deep discontent under which they suffer.
It expresses itself in thousandfold manifestations with one in despair and hopelessness, with another in ill will, anger, and indignation; with this man in indifference, and with that man in furious excesses. As witnesses to this inner dissatisfaction we may consider those who are weary of elections as well as the many who tend to the most fanatical extreme of the Left.
The young movement was intended primarily to appeal to these last. It is not meant to constitute an organization of the contented and satisfied, but to embrace those tormented by Success and failures of hitler, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented, and above all it must not swim on the surface of a national body, but strike roots deep within it.
In purely political terms, the following picture presented itself in The one, by far the smaller, includes the strata of the national intelligentsia, excluding all the physically active.
It is outwardly national, yet under this word can conceive of nothing but a very insipid and weak-kneed defense of so-called state interests, which in turn seem identical with dynastic interests.
They attempt to fight for their ideas and aims with spiritual weapons which are as fragmentary as they are superficial, and which fail completely in the face of the enemy's brutality.
With a single frightful blow this class, which only a short time before was still governing, is stretched on the ground and with trembling cowardice suffers every humiliation at the hands of the ruthless victor.
Confronting it is a second class, the broad mass of the laboring population. It is organized in more or less radical Marxist movements, determined to break all spiritual resistance by the power of violence.
It does not want to be national, but consciously rejects any promotion of national interests, just as, conversely, it aids and abets all foreign oppression. It is numerically the stronger and above all comprises all those elements of the nation without which a national resurrection is unthinkable and impossible.
For in this much was clear: But the prerequisites for this are not arms, as our bourgeois 'statesmen ' keep prattling, but the forces of the will. The German people had more than enough arms before.
They were not able to secure freedom because the energies of the national instinct of self-preservation, the will for self-preservation, were lacking. The best weapon is dead, worthless material as long as the spirit is lacking which is ready, willing, and determined to use it.
Germany became defenseless, not because arms were lacking, but because the will was lacking to guard the weapon for national survival.
If today more than ever our Left politicians are at pains to point out the lack of arms as the necessary cause of their spineless, compliant, actually treasonous policy, we must answer only one thing: Through your anti-national, criminal policy of abandoning national interests, you surrendered our arms.
Now you attempt to represent the lack of arms as the underlying cause of your miserable villainy. This, like everything you do, is lees and falsification. But this reproach applies just as much to the politicians on the Right.
For, thanks to their miserable cowardice, the Jewish rabble that had come to power was able in to steal the nation's arms.
They, too, have consequently no ground and no right to palm off our present lack of arms as the compelling ground for their wily caution read ' cowardice ' ; on the contrary, our defenselessness is the consequence of their cowardice.
Consequently the question of regaining German power is not: How shall we manufacture arms? How shall we manufacture the spirit which enables a people to bear arms?
If this spirit dominates a people, the will finds a thousand ways, every one of which ends in a weapon! But give a coward ten pistols and if attacked he will not be able to fire a single shot.INTRODUCTION. This session of the Reichstag takes place on a date which is full of significance for the German people.
Four years have passed since the beginning of that great internal revolution which in the meantime has been giving a new aspect to German life. Examine the successes and failures of the domestic policies of Mussolini and Hitler. The Aryan race is a racial grouping that emerged in the period of the late 19th century and midth century to describe people of Indo-European heritage..
It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the Caucasian race.
Warsaw Hitler, Himmler, and the Warsaw Uprising By Alexandra Richie Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York, Despite the thousands of books that have been written by Western historians about World War II a proportionately small number deal with those countries – Poland, Ukraine and Belarus – that bore the brunt of German and Soviet savagery.
What are the failures of Hitler? Update Cancel. Answer Wiki. 10 Answers. Kelly La Rue, Veteran, small business owner, The diversion was a success in large part because of a brilliant Spanish spy who worked for the Allies as a double agent feeding false information to the Nazis that D-Day was a diversion.
It is likely the invasion would have. Essay: Did the WWII Policy of Appeasement Fail? The failure of the Policy was largely deemed on that Appeasement was misconceived; Hitler’s ambitions to increase Germany’s borders and to expand Lebensraum, stretched much further than the legitimate grievances of Versailles.